by David O.
Jones
The “Battle Hymn of the Republic”
occupies a prominent position not only within the program of nearly every
nationalistic celebration, but also has become a part of many Christian
services. Admittedly, the anthem sounds good, but it is far from being a “hymn”
in the traditional sense of the word. Many Christians understand its stirring
words to provide an image of a victorious Church, but that is just not so! The
connotations of a spiritualized patriotism which have endeared it to many,
result from a mistaken and cursory reading of the song.
By
definition, a hymn is a song which incorporates theological truth into its text.
Wonderful examples of Christian hymns are “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God,” “Great
Is Thy Faithfulness” and “How Firm a Foundation.” But despite its author’s use
of biblical phrasing, the “Battle Hymn of the Republic” is not about Christ
“marching” against sin and the Church being “victorious” over evil. The
theological truths which it expresses are anti-Christian and anti-biblical, thus
it should never be sung by a Christian congregation.
The
“Battle Hymn of the Republic” was written in the fall of 1861. While in
Washington, D.C. with her husband, Mrs. Julia Ward Howe watched troops marching
off to war singing “John Brown’s Body.”She determined to write a more inspiring
war song to what was a good melody. First published in the Atlantic Monthly, she
received five dollars for her literary effort.
Born into a
prominent New York City family, Julia Ward was raised in a conservative,
Christian home. As a young woman she rebelled against her parents’ strong
Calvinism and ultimately married the Boston reformer, Dr. Samuel G. Howe. She
adopted the tenants of Transcendentalism, then Unitarianism, and it was in that
light that the “Battle Hymn” was written.
The
Transcendentalists became the core of the radical abolitionist movement. Dr.
Howe, as well as their Boston pastor, the Reverend Theodore Parker were two
members of the “Secret Six” who financed and armed the anti-slavery terrorist
John Brown. After his murderous rampage in Kansas and at Harper’s Ferry, Mrs.
Howe lamented, “John Brown’s death will be holy and glorious. John Brown will
glorify the gallows like Jesus glorified the cross.”
The
“Battle Hymn of the Republic” can only be understood within the framework of the
Transcendentalist-Unitarian creed. The first verse
reads:
Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the
Lord.
He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of
wrath are stored;
He has loosed the fateful lightning of His
terrible swift sword.
His truth is marching
on.
Mrs. Howe applied the apocalyptic judgment of the
Revelation (14:17-20 & 19:15) to the Confederate nation. She pictured the
Union army not only as that instrument which would cause Southern blood to flow
out upon the earth, but also the Union army as the very expression of His Word
(sword) itself. The Transcendentalist-Unitarians believed that the evil in man
could be rooted out by governmental action. The South was evil and was thus
deserving of judgment of the most extreme nature—its own
Armageddon.
The second verse follows the same theme by
presenting the Union army as the abode of their vengeful
God.
I have seen Him in the watch fires of a hundred
circling camps;
They have builded Him an altar in the
evening dews and damps;
I can read His righteous sentence by
the dim and flaring lamps.
His day is marching
on.
The third verse is so contrary of the Gospel of Jesus
Christ that many hymnals leave it out altogether.
I have
read the fiery gospel writ in burnished rows of steel.
As ye
deal with My contempters, so with you My grace shall
deal;
Let the hero born of woman crush the serpent with his
heel.
Since God is marching on.
Mrs.
Howe proclaimed a gospel of judgment pictured by rows of affixed bayonets.
Taking God’s promise of deliverance from Genesis 3:15, she applied it not to
Christ, but to the Union soldier who would receive God’s grace by killing
Southerners. This was certainly a different gospel; the kind of which the
Apostle Paul said, “But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other
gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed.”
(Galatians 1:8)
Verse four returns to the prose of the
Apocalypse with trumpet and judgment seat imagery:
He has
sounded forth the trumpet that shall never sound retreat;
He
is sifting out the hearts of men before His judgment seat.
O
be swift, my soul, to answer Him! Be jubilant, my feet!
Our
God is marching on.
The problem again is that civil warfare
was the instrument being promoted for determining the hearts of men. A man’s
positive response to the call for enlistment in the Union army was the action
which would reveal their standing before God.
The fifth and
final verse gives the ultimate expression of the warped and anti-biblical
theology which possessed the radical abolitionists.
In the
beauty of the lilies, Christ was born across the sea,
With a
glory in His bosom that transfigures you and me.
As He died
to make men holy, let us die to make men free,
While God is
marching on.
To Julia Ward Howe the work of Christ was
incomplete. It was up to men through civil government to bring about a utopian
society. She was quoted in her biography, “Not until the Civil War did I
officially join the Unitarian church and accept the fact the Christ was merely a
great teacher with no higher claim to preeminence in wisdom, goodness, and power
than any other man.” (emphasis mine)
The “Battle Hymn” theme
has nothing to do with Christianity or God. It is a political-patriotic song
about the destruction of the South, written in religious terminology. It is a
clever product. Howe deliberately created the idea that the North was doing
God’s work. It paints a picture of a vengeful God destroying His enemies—the
South, and elevating the North’s cause to that of a “holy war.” In doing so,
Howe portrayed the South and its people as evil and the enemy of God.
Outrageous, but it worked.
As a Unitarian, Julia Ward Howe
believed the Unitarian doctrine that man is characteristically good and he can
redeem himself by his own merits without any help from a saviour. She rejected
basic biblical truths such as a literal hell—“I threw away, once and forever,
the thought of the terrible hell which appears to me
impossible.”
Mrs. Howe also refuted the exclusive claim of
Jesus, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except
through Me.” (John 14:6) by saying, “Having rejected the exclusive doctrine that
made Christianity and special forms of it the only way of spiritual redemption,
I now accept the belief that not only Christians but all human beings, no matter
what their religion, are capable of redemption. Christianity was but one of
God’s plans for bringing all of humanity to a state of ultimate
perfection.”
Our challenge is to bring a proper
understanding of the nature of this battle anthem to the leadership of the
Christian church. No Christian church would intentionally sing a song of praise
to Satan’s doctrines, nor would any pastor or elder lead their flock into
rebellion against true biblical doctrine. Yet by ignorance, is has been done on
a regular basis in the American church. The “Battle Hymn of the Republic” is
apostasy. It promotes hatred and vengeful destruction. It has no place in a
worship service.
My ancestors, on both my parents' sides, fought for the Confederacy. I am not against Dixie! I recognize Julia Ward Howe's notions and sentiments in writing the "Battle Hymn of the Republic", Chuck Demastus. I don't support her views. But the song can also be seen simply as a metaphor for the spiritual battle ongoing now, even correctly. It is even easier to embrace the song in our day, when the memories and thoughts of the War Between the States are dim and far between in an era where revisionist history is busy destroying Southern Heritage. So, I can see this issue both ways, depending upon whose eyes (and lips) we refer to. Keep up the good work, and calling attention to factual history. But recall that things change as humanity goes "marching" thru time and cultural transformations. I believe the "Battle Hymn of the Republic" can be deemed rehabilitated in the dilution of time. Words' meanings, singly and in phrases, do change in the public understanding.
ReplyDelete